Monday, November 7, 12:00, A 0.23
Author: Matthijs van Veelen (University of Amsterdam)
In and out of equilibrium: evolution of strategies in repeated games
with discounting and population structure
Repeated games tend to have large sets of equilibria. We also know that in
the repeated prisoners dilemma there is a profusion of neutrally stable
strategies, but no strategy that is evolutionarily stable. But how stable is
neutrally stable? We show that there is always a stepping stone path away from
equilibrium: there is always a neutral mutant that can enter a population and
create an actual selective advantage for a second mutant. Such stepping stone
paths out of equilibrium generally exist both in the direction of more and in
the direction of less cooperation.
While the central theorems show that such paths out of equilibrium exist, they could still be rare compared to the size of the strategy space. Simulations however suggest that they are not too rare to be found by a reasonable mutation process, and that typical simulation paths take the population from equilibrium to equilibrium through series of indirect invasions.
Furthermore we combine repetition with population structure. Especially the interplay between these two fundamental ingredients of the evolution of cooperation is interesting; with high continuation probabilities, only a little bit of population structure goes a long way. That suggests that the recipe for human cooperation may just have been: a lot of repetition and a little bit of population structure.